I have considered why the swastica has a visceral reaction and the hammer and sickle does not. People use the tag of calling someone a nazi as ( rightfully) as the lowest of the low but leaders of the left ( including the founders of blm) see marxism as not only morally better but an actual goal.
Why is this? Nazism was tried one time and it was evil. Marxism has been tried several times and in almost every case it is equally as evil. Some will say " well...it was just not done by the right people". No one says that about nazism.
I think the answer might lie with the single nazi notion of race superiority. Of course they weren't alone in that. Japanese and their shinto religion also included race superiority and also enabled horrible things on " gaijin".
Marxism doesn't have that one single trait that people can point to and say " that is the cause of evil" but evil it is and needs to be treated as such.
Why is this? Nazism was tried one time and it was evil. Marxism has been tried several times and in almost every case it is equally as evil. Some will say " well...it was just not done by the right people". No one says that about nazism.
I think the answer might lie with the single nazi notion of race superiority. Of course they weren't alone in that. Japanese and their shinto religion also included race superiority and also enabled horrible things on " gaijin".
Marxism doesn't have that one single trait that people can point to and say " that is the cause of evil" but evil it is and needs to be treated as such.
