ADVERTISEMENT

Email I sent to the TX. HS UIL director and board

J Jo

Red Raider
Gold Member
Jan 13, 2005
2,533
5,201
113
Dallas
  • To: athletics@uiltexas.org <athletics@uiltexas.org>; bpolk@uiltexas.org <bpolk@uiltexas.org>; bbelk@uiltexas.org <bbelk@uiltexas.org>; ajmartinez@uiltexas.org <ajmartinez@uiltexas.org>; jgarmon@uiltexas.org <jgarmon@uiltexas.org>
  • Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2019, 01:41:24 PM CST
    Subject: Making DFW Athletic Realignment Districts Fair for 2020-2022
    Director Elza & Board Members:
    As a long time resident, parent of an athlete, and sports fan in the Dallas-Fort Worth metro area, I was anxious to see your UIL Reclassification & Realignment 2020-2022 student enrollments and breakdowns of your 6A and 5A classifications. While you look to be trying to make fair competition for the competing schools, I would like to propose you take it a step farther when you issue your new districts on February 3, 2020. This fair realignment of districts could be done in all of the large metro areas that contain many schools, but since I am from the DFW area I propose you put all or most of the 4000+ student mega schools in one district. This district could include the following schools:
    1) Allen HS 6,959 students
    2) Plano East HS 5,579 students
    3) Plano West HS 5,445 students
    4) Plano SR. HS. 4,999 students
    5) Duncanville HS 4,529 students
    6) Lewisville HS 4,468 students
    7) Arlington Houston HS 4,204 students
    8) Skyline HS 4,189 students
    9) Coppell HS 4.088 students
    Closely followed by:
    10) Lewisville Hebron 3,787 students
    11) Arlington Martin 3,674 students
    12) Lewisville Flower Mound 3,651 students
    13) Euless Trinity 3,618 students
    14) South Grand Prairie 3,340 students
    15) Lewisville Marcus 3,094 students
    16) Hurst Bell 3,087 students
    17) McKinney HS 3,049 students
    Since you have already considered the student enrollment numbers in your realignment and reclassification numbers, you must realize it is most often very hard for 6A schools with student numbers in the 2220 to 2999 student populations for instance to compete with these 4000+ student populations. Please do the right thing for our student athletes of the state in your coming district realignments. It just makes sense.
    Regards,


 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Go Big.
Get Premium.

Join Rivals to access this premium section.

  • Say your piece in exclusive fan communities.
  • Unlock Premium news from the largest network of experts.
  • Dominate with stats, athlete data, Rivals250 rankings, and more.
Log in or subscribe today Go Back