I searched other threads for this, but didn't find any satisfying answers. Sorry if it was out there and I missed it.
Here's my beef/question.... Ok, it's more of a beef.
ESPN has Jack ranked 42.
Scout has him at 39.
247 has him at 48.
Move over to Rivals and he's 126!!!!
Now let's all sing along....
Which one of these isn't like the others. Which one doesn't belong!
Now we all know these rankings are only indications of potential and aren't going to change the fact that Jack is going to be a stud at Tech if he stays healthy. But really? Ranking him 70-80 spots lower than everybody else? What do the Rivals guys think they know that everybody else doesn't.
In before... Jimmies rustled!!!!
Here's my beef/question.... Ok, it's more of a beef.
ESPN has Jack ranked 42.
Scout has him at 39.
247 has him at 48.
Move over to Rivals and he's 126!!!!
Now let's all sing along....
Which one of these isn't like the others. Which one doesn't belong!
Now we all know these rankings are only indications of potential and aren't going to change the fact that Jack is going to be a stud at Tech if he stays healthy. But really? Ranking him 70-80 spots lower than everybody else? What do the Rivals guys think they know that everybody else doesn't.
In before... Jimmies rustled!!!!
