I was wondering what teams in the conference would be hurt the most if their starting QB went down? How about both in the two deep? It happened to us in '13 and again in '14.
#1. TCU if Boykin went down--no experience past him
Beyond that, it is hard to say. UT doesn't have an experienced backup, but it's not like they have been a pass-happy team anyway. Ok, they are switching to the spread, but losing Swoopes might convince Strong that they should go back to a power run game.
Baylor doesn't have an experienced backup either, but they have a damn good run game. And they do a good job of coaching up the QB's (when they're not protecting felons).
K St might be in a lot of trouble. Their QB is inexperienced, and their main backup is not even recognizable.
Ok St--They think their QB could be all-world. I'm not so sure, but their backup at least has some experience , and he had his moments.
Tech, as much as some of you hate on Webb, I think Tech could be ok. I believe both our two backups have experience, maturity and a good supporting cast
OU--same as Tech--I think our #1 is clearly better than their #1, they have two backups that may be players, too given the chance.
No one else is worth mentioning.
#1. TCU if Boykin went down--no experience past him
Beyond that, it is hard to say. UT doesn't have an experienced backup, but it's not like they have been a pass-happy team anyway. Ok, they are switching to the spread, but losing Swoopes might convince Strong that they should go back to a power run game.
Baylor doesn't have an experienced backup either, but they have a damn good run game. And they do a good job of coaching up the QB's (when they're not protecting felons).
K St might be in a lot of trouble. Their QB is inexperienced, and their main backup is not even recognizable.
Ok St--They think their QB could be all-world. I'm not so sure, but their backup at least has some experience , and he had his moments.
Tech, as much as some of you hate on Webb, I think Tech could be ok. I believe both our two backups have experience, maturity and a good supporting cast
OU--same as Tech--I think our #1 is clearly better than their #1, they have two backups that may be players, too given the chance.
No one else is worth mentioning.
